I don’t have any trouble believing that the planes that crashed into tower one and two were not commercial planes. I son’t have a solid opinion about that at this time.
Now, what I do know is that people make terrible witness, they get things wrong, mixed up, they automatically pick up what they other people around them saying and all of that becomes part of the truth. That’s why in trials eye witness accounts aren’t enough to prosecute and win in a lot of cases.
When they show the plane in this video it does look really gray, a dark gray but again, you can see it is in the shadows. Just before it hits the building the wing and tail goes into the sunlight and it isn’t so dark looking anymore.
Oh one more thing, they said they couldn’t have been planes that hit because there was no wing shaped crash to the building, I looked at other videos and images and I was able to see the planes wing slice into the building.
I am going to start off with the fact that I don’t know which side the plane came from, there could be a possibility that it couldn’t be seen because it was coming low from the direction behind the twin towers. That would have made it impossible for the news anchors to see it. BUT then I see other video that shows “a missile” which I didn’t really see at all.
You know I am writing this as I watch right? Ok, cause I am.
Now in part 4 around the 1.00 min mark they kinda got me there, THAT part was pretty interesting. BUT I would love to track down the original source of the new video juuuuuust to double check that what this series is showing me has not been tampered with. See I told you I was cynical.
Aaaaaaaannnnd they lost me again. Now the practically invisible “missile” path has a new optical shape to watch and oddly enough it is a LOT clearer and more obvious than the one they showed at the beginning of the tape. Ugh I am confused, why didn’t they lead with that image? Are they saying that the government made it more noticeable to later pass it off as the plane?
If you’re interested you can read what I had to say about Part One and Part Two of this World Trade Center series in my previous posts.
Part THREE of WTC No Plane Theory Series:
You see the first tower burning, the second tower in behind it and to the left. This leaves a gap of space between the first tower hit and whatever that building is beside it. In this view we cannot see tower 2, it is hidden by tower 1. You can see the explosion from the crash though, that mushrooms out from around building one.
The person who made this video talks about something black near the bottom of the screen just before the second tower was hit. I think that it’s perfectly reasonable to believe it was the plane, not a missile as the narrator claims. You can’t see a whole lot of it because the gap in the buildings is pretty small from this angle. And the whole “wingless” thing,? The images are so blurry and it was moving so fast it’s easy to see why things like that wouldn’t be super clean. This isn’t high def we are talking about, and the angle of the plane, the shade in relation to the morning sun and the surrounding buildings all have to be taken into consideration.
Think I saw wings when they said there was none in the video they were highlighting. Again I think the light played with the image a bit, and you could definitely see the left wing when it crashed into the tower at about 2.34 on the WTC No Plane Theory (Part 3) vid,
Honestly I think a lot of this is grasping at straws. I remember watching it all that day, and I’ve watched a lot of videos lately and there were a LOT of birds flying around the area, flocks of them. Which I thought was weird btw, but that is a different topic. That speck pointed out near the end could be a million different things. Every sing day there are plane and helicopter trours flying over the river for the tourists, it could have been one of those. Could also be a bird, oddly enough there were tons and tons of them around the building that day.
As for the sound, I don’t necessarily think that it is impossible for these to be more than one explosion. First you have the plane actually crashing, one explosion, then you have it coming out the other side, two explosions, then you have the fuel tank actually blowing up for what makes at least 3 explosions. That will come one by one.
I can’t make any comments on the sirens because I would need to hear from the policemen and firemen involved why they shut off their sirens. I know that sirens make it harder for everyone to hear what is going on, that’s why they wear those special headsets. They very well could have been asked to shut down the sirens so everyone could hear what was happening and what they should do. That, to me, makes sense. That would have been a wide broadcast too all responding officers.
I find this part of the series so far the most annoying. Planes have an annoying shriek too, missiles aren’t the only things that have them. BUT in my opinion the person making this video is full of shit, I think it’s totally possible that the “missile shriek” they say they heard the one they replay over and over for a split second, is the sound of one of the rescue sirens. It’s so short, it def could be.
You may or may not have read my previous post about what I thought about the first part of the World Trade Center No Plane Theory documentary on YouTube. If not you can read my commentary to get caught up to speed, but most of my comments are directly related to the video at the top of each post, so I don’t think you will be lost if you watch the one above and read my opinions below:
Part TWO of the WTC No Plane Theory
They show what a Boeing is supposed to look like, it’s gray with stripes, then the commentary in the video says ooooh, look at how black it looks is this super crappy video. Clearly it’s a darker plane. The video was hideous in terms of clarity, all fuzzy and out of focus, in my esteemed opinion it could still have been a Boeing.
The next thing they want you to see is that in the video from the street just before the plane comes into contact with Tower 2 you can “clearly see” the plane is white. I hate to burst anyone’s bubble but it was a bright sunny morning and if the sun hit the plane just right it could definitely appear very light in color. Besides, am not even sure what color the plane really was supposed to be, I am going to have to go and look that up now. They weren’t all the exact same planes I don’t think.
Video writing on the screen says you can’t have it both ways. BUT you can. Depending on the way the sun is hitting the plane it can easily look all dark or not. I have personally seen planes that looked a dark shade of gray and many of them were really a light color. The video keeps refrencing the way the plane changes color from when it’s approaching the scene to when it actually hits, I think this could be explained by the morning sun or the quality of the video. What they show of the “black plane” is nowhere near the quality of the video of the white one. Of course I’m no expert, but then again neither are the people saying these things.
Too many people were there on September 11 watching from the street, too many people with camera phones, and cameras, it’s been seen from every possible angle and there is no way they could get everyone to lie for them, no way they could have tracked down every single person who may have snapped a shot. I can’t buy that at all.
BUT I am totally open to why the planes hit and who was behind it. I don’t think Bush was behind it but his cronies? I think they are more than capable of pulling off this kind of evil for their own means. They couldn’t trust Bush to not screw things up so of course they would keep him out of the loop, he is way too stupid to let in on the deal.
So watching the WTC No Plane Theory series on youtube section by section and taking them apart piece by piece. Not super convinced when it comes to a lot of what they have to say. Please remember that while I will pick apart what they say, I am not automatically saying I believe the US government about anything. I am cynical of everything, truth and lies get scrutinized in my book. Hard facts work for me, other things may cause me to ask questions but not necessarily convince me on their own.
I have watched 3 parts already and taken so many notes it’s like a friggen essay already! I will post each of the three videos with my comments one post at a time.
Part ONE of WTC No Plane Theory
I do think a plane could pass through the World Trade Center buildings with it’s nose intact. The plane that hit that day never passed through the core of the building which is the most solid part, the shape of it would help as well. It crashed on the side and the curvature of the nose of any plane is designed that way for a reason. The vast speed alone would easily propel the place through the building
I can buy a missile hitting the pentagon but I don’t believe that no planes hit the towers on September 11th. I can believe the planes had explosives attached to them to create more damage but too many individual sources caught the planes hitting the towers from all angles for me to even consider they didn’t exist.
I dunno if this is real or not but it’s hilarious either way. I am pasting it in exactly the way I saw it, bad grammar, spelling, punctuation and all. So funny:
This essay was written by an 8th grader in Pittsburgh in the spring of
2004. The assignment was to pick an enangered species, and explain why
it’s important to save it. The typos and formatting are preserved from
the original.
Richard XXXXXXXX Draft 2
I shouldn’t do shit. I don’t care about them they all
could die and it won’t affect my life. I know a lot about them
but I don’t need to think about them. They’re just a waste of
time koalas are stupid they don’t help me with shit so why
should I help them. If they all die there will be more room for
the panthers and all the other hard animals. Koalas are weak a
pit will get rid of their whole fucking family. That’s why I
don’t like koalas.
Koalas have sharp claws but they are weak. They all small
and fat and they be climing trees. I hope a storm just come
while theyjust chilling up in the tree thinking they is hard and
they’re will all just fall off. They just break they neck and
shit. When they fall they claws are going to fall off and they
going to be crying like some little bitches.
Koalas aren’t hard they some little bitches. They start
climbing up the tree soon as they see a deer from like 50feet
away. They stupid as hell they should put their brain in their
pouch and put the kid in they ten they’re be able to think
better. They try to be in the fucking kangaroo family. They weak
as hell, talking bout they got a pouch a kangaroo so they their
cousins and shit. Kangaroo’s have some big ass legs and whot do
a koala got? Some little ass legs, they tails is little and weak
as fuck kangaroo’s got a big ass long tail that can kill a
fucking koala.
If a koala goes in the water it won’t be able to breathe
with its little short ass. It’d fucking drown soon aas it take
one step into the water. While they at the river trying to get
something to drink a bear could just come to him and snatch its
ass up. It doesn’t know protection because they don’t have
protection. What they little ass going to do? It can’t scratch
him. The bear will beat his fucking ass.
The important think about koalas is that just don’t care
about tem and let them die by all the other animals in
Australia. They’re not important just let nature do what it do
and kill them. Koalas do not have a place in this world there’s
not enough room for all the bitches in this world. So let all
the koalas that’s in the zoos and shit. Let them go and put them
back with their family. If you let them all go they won’t
nothing except for that’s what they was put in this world for.
Now you know why koalas aren’t important. They have
nothing to do except for sitting around in the trees. It’s like
they just was like they was sent have to die. Koalas don’t do
nothing to help anybody. Thre would be just one more relative of
the kangaroo that will be six feet under. Now you know why
koalas are not important because there are dumb.
Was watching Supernatural and saw an actor (Shawn Roberts) that looked familiar but I could just not place him and that drives me nuts. Obviously I took to handy dandy imdb to check it out and it turns out that he’s been a lot of cheap indie horror flicks and I’ve seen pretty much all of them!
I feel bad because I watched them all just in the last couple of weeks and I still had to look him up! That and the fact that he isn’t referenced on the imdb page for that ep of Supernatural.
I quite like him though and he’s Canadian, so yay! Loving Misha being a regular character, I sure wish he hadn’t made that Paul Bernardo movie. But what can you do?
Actually I think he went past putting his foot in him mouth and actually shoved it all the way down his throat straight into his colon! lol! This is what NOT to ask Jamie Lynn Sigler if you haven’t been keeping up with her life through the every funny tabloid press:
Click this link to see probably the most awkward interview of the poor guys career: The Quick Fix: Dan Harris
This is a must see video but the best part is at the end. Though, the pole dancer falling really far and really hard onto her face was pretty freakin’ hilarious too. I’m sorry (not really) but I love watching people fall. I mean, I don’t want to see them fall or die, or even break anything, though a little blood is still funny. But I digress.
The best part of this video is the last part, there are three videos, but the last one is by far my favorite. I have seen more than a million cute, silly or funny pet videos, at least it feels like that many, but this I have NEVER seen, not even seen something remotely similar.
It’s an adorable dog in his cute little blue puppy sweater with a most unusual talent for peeing. I don’t even know how he manages to do it the way he does, it shouldn’t be, like, physically possible.
So, sit back, watch a chick fall flat on her face off a pole, a guy almost get run through with a branch and a hilariously and surprisingly cute (considering it’s peeing) clip of a dog relieving himself (or herself??).
I picked up a new book at Costco the other day. It is written by James Frey and called
Bright Shiny Morning. Of course is was one of those versions I love with interesting tidbits about not just the story but the author at the back of the book.
Beyond reminding me what a fucking raving bitch Oprah is, it made me think about why it is I write. he said when he does he thinks the following things (forgive me for paraphrasing a bit)L
1) Where is [the character]
2) What is he/she doing
3) How is the character feeling
Sounds pretty basic right? I kinda thought so at first too but when I really began to ponder it, that is what good writing is all about. Literally, all what it’s about.
This in turn got me to thinking why I write and I have come to a conclusion, a startling and maybe depressing conclusion but one none the less. I write to feel something. I want to feel. I want to feel love, joy, pain, happiness, fear, death, sex and everything inbetween. I want to feel and in my everyday life I don’t.
